Essay Topic:
Should the Philippines reinstate death penalty?

What is capital punishment? Capital punishment or in layman’s term death
penalty is an execution of an offender to death after a conviction by a court
of law of a criminal offense. Crimes that can result to death penalty are murder,
treason, drug smuggling or other capital and heinous crimes. In some countries
such as Saudi Arabia , homosexuality and apostasy are punishable by death.
Around the world, only 36 countries are actively practising
capital punishment, while 103 countries had completely abolished the dreaded
punishment. Some countries, including the Philippines, has suspended it
indefinitely.
In the Philippines, heinous crimes that rocked the citizens
to its core has resulted of renewed calls for the government to revive death
penalty. But should the Philippines resurrect capital punishment?
In every perspectives, the death penalty should remain dead.
“Death Penalty deters people from doing heinous crime”
Proponents argue that capital punishment discourages people
from committing heinous crimes.
However, this is not entirely true. Statistics says
otherwise.
There are several studies refuting the claim that capital punishment deters
crime rates.
A study by Amnesty International in the United States found
out that the murder in non-death penalty states is considerably lower than the
states that implement capital punishment. In year 2011 alone, Alaska, a state
that doesn’t impose capital punishment, has 29 case of murder which is 92%
lower compared to the state of Arizona which has 405 case of murder.
Similarly, in a survey conducted by American Criminology Society among
criminologists, 88 percent believed that the punishment of death penalty is not
a deterrent to murder.
Experts also conclude that capital punishment does not discourage people from
doing crimes. Jeffrey Fagan, a law professor at Columbia University, shared common
voice. He said that there is no credible scientific evidence that hinders
criminal behaviour. He continued that executions are only meant to satisfy
one’s vengeance.
Even in the Philippines, capital punishment, before it was
suspended, failed to stop the numbers of crime from rising. During the administration of Estrada, crime
rate from the year 1999 increased by 15.3 percent or a total of 82,538 from
71,527 crimes in the previous year.
“It shows that the justice system has no sympathy for the criminals.”
Timothy Evans was a
Welshman accused of murdering his wife and his infant child at their residence.
He was convicted and sentenced by hanging. Three years after his execution, he
was exonerated by court as police found evidence that his neighbour, John
Christie, a serial killer was responsible for the murder of his wife and child.
One of the arguments raised by supporters of capital punishment is that death
penalty provides the justice to the innocent souls of their crimes. However,
there are also several cases of miscarriage of justice. Miscarriage of justice
happens when an innocent is convicted and punished for the crimes they did not
commit.
A 2014 study conducted estimated that 4.1% of inmates awaiting
execution on death row in the United States are innocent, and that at least 340
innocent people may have been executed since 1973.
With numbers given, capital punishment is fundamentally
flawed and does not guarantee that it will provide actual justice instead it
becomes injustice to the innocent persons sentenced to death. Reviving death
penalty is bound to repeat tragic and haunting execution of Timothy Evans.
Even if death penalty is reinstated crime itself will not be
prevented because there are varied reasons why people commit crime. Serial
killers, for example, commits horrendous crime because of their “urge” or “motivation”.
Meanwhile crimes of passion makes someone commit crime because of intense
feeling or affection.
Scientific study and statistical data conducted by various
people and organization has proven that capital punishment is not an effective deterrent
against crime and the worst reality of capital punishment is miscarriage of
justice. Executing an innocent man to
his death is haunting and declaring someone innocent after his execution still cannot
bring back the life of an innocent soul and the justice brought to parties involved.
Injustice is immeasurable.
End notes:
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/deterrence-states-without-death-penalty-have-had-consistently-lower-murder-rates
https://kimkarla.wordpress.com/2013/01/06/re-imposing-of-death-penalty-in-the-philippines-approve-or-disapprove/
http://www.ihra.net/death-penalty-project
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/executed-possibly-innocent
http://www.biography.com/people/groups/unnatural-death-executed
http://pcij.org/blog/2006/04/18/a-timeline-of-death-penalty-in-the-philippines
http://dokumentaryonijuantagalog.weebly.com/history-of-public-enemy.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/wales/entries/cdc56160-91eb-366d-ae0e-5d9c5a676fe2
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/many-prisoners-on-death-row-are-wrongfully-convicted/
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/justice/841077/Death-penalty-Your-verdict-99-of-Sun-readers-from-our-poll-vote-in-favour-of-reintroducing-capital-punishment.html